Ollama vs LocalAI: Which Model is Right for Your Local Deployment in 2025?
- Philip Moses
- May 8
- 3 min read
Updated: 3 days ago
In 2025, the push toward running large language models (LLMs) locally has accelerated — driven by demands for tighter data privacy, lower latency, and greater cost control. Among the leading solutions enabling local AI deployment are Ollama and LocalAI, each offering distinct capabilities depending on your goals and infrastructure.
In this blog, we’ll break down how Ollama and LocalAI compare in terms of deployment flexibility, model support, customization options, hardware requirements, and developer experience.
We’ll also highlight the latest updates from both platforms and help you decide which tool fits your local AI deployment strategy best.
🧠 What Are Ollama and LocalAI?
Ollama is an open-source platform built for easy local deployment of LLMs right on your hardware. Its focus is on simplicity, letting users quickly run models like Llama 3.3 and DeepSeek R1 without needing a cloud connection.
LocalAI, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive AI stack. It's designed as a drop-in replacement for OpenAI’s API and supports a broader range of models, including text, image, and audio generation. It runs efficiently across devices, from lightweight laptops to full-fledged servers.
🔍 Feature Comparison
Feature | Ollama | LocalAI |
| Local execution on personal or enterprise hardware | Local execution with flexible deployment options |
| Focused on models like Llama 3.3, DeepSeek R1 | Supports text, image, and audio models |
| Command-line interface (CLI) | OpenAI-compatible API and Web-based UI |
| Custom models and extensions | Extensible with support for agents and semantic search |
| Optimized for GPU acceleration (but can run on CPUs) | Designed to perform well even without GPUs |
| Strong GitHub presence with 138k+ stars | Active open-source community under MIT license |
✅ Key Advantages
Ollama
Privacy & Control: Data stays on your device for maximum security.
High Performance: Local execution means ultra-low latency and fast responses.
User-Friendly CLI: Simple command-line management for deploying and updating models.
Ollama and LocalAI: Exploring top choices for local deployment with ease of use and comprehensive AI stack compatibility.
LocalAI
Versatile Modalities: Handles text, image, and audio models, plus autonomous agents.
CPU-Friendly: Runs well even on systems without GPUs.
Developer Integration: OpenAI-compatible API makes embedding AI into apps seamless.
🧩 Which One Should You Choose?
Pick Ollama if:
You prefer a simple, text-focused setup.
You have access to GPUs and want optimized performance.
You like managing models via a clean command-line interface.
Choose LocalAI if:
You need a broader range of AI capabilities (beyond just text).
You're working with CPU-only hardware but still want great performance.
You need OpenAI API compatibility for easy integration into apps.
🚀 What’s New in 2025?
Both Ollama and LocalAI have evolved significantly this year. Here's what's happening:
Ollama in 2025:
Wider Model Support: Now runs not only Llama models but also Google Gemma, DeepSeek, Mistral, Microsoft Phi-4, Qwen, Code Llama, IBM Granite, and embedding models.
Tool Calling: Supports function calling to let LLMs interact with external tools.
Structured Outputs: Constrain outputs to specific formats like JSON for precise control.
API Updates: Added initial compatibility with OpenAI’s Chat Completions API.
Hardware Optimizations: Now optimized for Apple Silicon and AMD GPUs.
Community Strength: Massive and growing GitHub and Discord communities.
LocalAI in 2025:
Expanded AI Stack: Introduced LocalAI Core (text, image, audio, vision APIs), LocalAGI (autonomous agents), and LocalRecall (semantic search).
P2P Distributed Inference: New peer-to-peer capabilities for decentralized LLM hosting.
Constrained Grammars: More structured and controlled outputs.
WebUI Upgrades: Sleeker and more intuitive web interface.
Strong Developer Ecosystem: Emphasizes compatibility with existing libraries via OpenAI-like APIs.
🏁 Conclusion : Which One Should You Pick in Late 2025?
Go with Ollama if you need easy local LLM deployment, high performance with GPU support, and a clean CLI experience for primarily text-focused tasks.
Choose LocalAI if you require a versatile AI stack, CPU efficiency, multi-modal support (text, images, audio), and smooth API integration with your existing tech.
Both tools are pushing the boundaries of what’s possible with local AI deployments. Your best choice really comes down to your specific needs and your available hardware.
Comments